Homo Sapiens are limited by the many factors of being a Homo Sapien. One of these factors is the power of an individual's brain. Another factor is how much knowledge that brain has acquired. Another factor is the person's psyche. Another factor is the person's milieu.

This is what some evolutionists say happened. There was nothing. Then there was something. Nothing created something.

After that, there was chaos.  Then order came out of chaos.  Then design came out of chaos.

The situation becomes more absurd as you consider the postulates. First "nothing" had to create the "laws" of physics and chemistry, etc. What will be the speed of light? What will be the speed of gravity? How will the molecules of hydrogen and oxygen interact with each other? How could "nothing" do that?

Then "nothing" had to create the physical stuff of the universe. This stuff that will function according to the "laws" that were created first. How did "nothing" match the laws with the stuff.

A problem some evolutions have "solved" by maintaining that the universe has always existed - just ignore the creation problem.

The mindless idea that evolution is the foundation of the sciences. The pioneers of many of the various scientific disciplines were people who had accepted Yeshua as Savior and made Him Lord of their lives. (See the book "Men of Science, Men of Faith". Ponder what the evolutionists are saying: someone who believed that Yeshua created the world founded a science that is based on Yeshua not creating the world. These scientists had a philosophical mindset that Yeshua spoke the world into existence and yet the evolutionists say these minds produced postulates that evolution created the objects of their study. It is not necessary that you have an IQ at least as high as the 98th percentile and have graduate training in Behavioral Science to comprehend how preposterous that is.

The driving force to assert evolution is the desire to eliminate God. Darwin's "bulldog" Huxley said the reason they eagerly accepted evolution was that enabled them to give rein to their sexual appetites without fear of God punishing them with a lake of fire.

All of the animals in this world are magnificent. Not any of them are freaks on the way to becoming something else. If evolution had occurred, some of the animals in this world would look somewhat like what their ancestors were and somewhat like what they are becoming. Their DNA would be changing.

Some devotees of evolution have posited "punctuated equilibrium" to eliminate this reality. One of a dinosaur's offspring came out as a fully developed bird - no transitional form. The DNA changed in an instance.

Why don't we see "punctuated equilibrium" now?  If evolution had happened, it would still be happening.

The fossil record does not show evolution. There should be thousands of transitonal fossils.

Evolutionist draw a "tree of life" which depicts the animals of this world on the various "branches" with all coming from a common trunk.

Why don't we see many "trees of life". The conditions that brought about one "tree of life" would bring about several "trees of life". If evolution started one "tree" it would keep on starting them. If evolution had happened, it would still be happening.

The "tree of life" starts with a "simple" cell. The first error in this concept is that the "simple" cell is very complex. The most powerful microscopes reveal an awesome design within a cell.

Propopents of evoluton are maintaining that the foundation of the sciences is evolution. Science is not evolution. Many of the sciences were started by men who believed that Yeshua spoke the earth and all that is in it into existence. See the book, "Men of Science, Men of Faith". Therefore, with this mindset, how did they found a science that is based on Yeshua not creating the world? The human brain just does not function that way. Lesser intellects have inferred something into the foundations of the sciences that the founders of the sciences did not place there.

Did you hear Paul Harvey talking about the "closet theologian"? In the theater of your mind, imagine one of your college science teachers and the the "closet theologian" standing before all of the founders of the sciences and the teacher saying "the closet theologian" was not a scientist. Talk about the theater of the absurd. The "closet theologian" was Isaac Newton.

Intelligent design. The dismissive statements people make against intelligent design are downright sophomoric. It would be interesting to hear, as you drive by Mount Rushmore, your comments about what the wind and rain created over billions of years. A Great Creator, Yeshua HaMashiach, is the "Razor". The probability is small that William had an IQ higher than mine.